[Koha-devel] Release Manager 3.6

[D Ruth Bavousett]

On 5/11/2011 1:38 PM, Nicole Engard wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Chris Cormack<chris at bigballofwax.co.nz>  wrote:
>> Options as I see them
>> 1/ Continue with the current workflow, patches signed off, passed qa,
>> then into master, with the goal to increase the rate patches are
>> signed off
> This is my vote! I know it takes more work and more time for features
> to be approved, but I'm for a more stable, tested Koha.
Nicole says it spot-on; the current process requires some more time, but 
it is *well* worth it, in terms of a running product, IMO.  +1 for option 1.

I also strongly approve of Chris's leadership of this transition 
phase--you've done a great job, Chris.  It's been an adjustment, for 
everyone, getting to the slightly-more-challenging process, but most 
folks I have talked to feel that it does make for a better product.

-- 
*D Ruth Bavousett*
Lead Migration Specialist
ByWater Solutions
Support and Consulting for Open Source Software
VISIT US AT ALA: BOOTH 732
Headquarters: Santa Barbara, CA
Office: Washington, DC
Phone/Fax (888)900-8944
http://bywatersolutions.com
ruth at bywatersolutions.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20110511/d918bbdc/attachment.htm>