[Koha-devel] Release Manager 3.6

[Chris Nighswonger]

Hi Paul,

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain at biblibre.com>wrote:

> Do you think/mean we should just create all our patches with status
> "signed-off" ? It's a kind of "shortcut" / "A-developer" isn't it ?
>

We are currently accepting patches into QA which are signed off by employees
of the same company as the author of the patch.

So I'm a bit confused as to why Biblibre cannot adopt a similar procedure in
order to get their patches into QA?

Perhaps if the issue is moving patches representing larger/more complicated
features through QA, the submitter could provide references to
installations/clients currently running the feature(s). The QA manager could
then contact the supplied reference to verify QA and push the patch on up
the chain.

Kind Regards,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20110512/2109842e/attachment.htm>