[Koha-devel] deafult for biblio.frameworkcode

[Zeno Tajoli]

Hi to all,

Il 09/01/2012 16:55, Ian Walls ha scritto:
> I support 942$f for the following reasons:
> 
> 1. best to use an existing tag, and 942 is the best-fit candidate for
> non-repeating biblio-level, Koha-specific information
> 
> 2. New subfields for new content, rather than repurposing an old field (and
> possibly having data conflicts on systems that still have the old, obsolete
> value)
> 
> 3. subfield letter is the initial (in English) for the thing being stored;
> easy to remember!

for me 942 $f is OK.

Bye
Zeno Tajoli
-- 
Dott. Zeno Tajoli
tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it
fax +39 02 2135520
CILEA - Consorzio Interuniversitario
http://www.cilea.it/disclaimer