[Koha-devel] deafult for biblio.frameworkcode

[Galen Charlton]

Hi,

On 01/09/2012 10:55 AM, Ian Walls wrote:
> I support 942$f for the following reasons:
>
> 1. best to use an existing tag, and 942 is the best-fit candidate for
> non-repeating biblio-level, Koha-specific information
>
> 2. New subfields for new content, rather than repurposing an old field
> (and possibly having data conflicts on systems that still have the old,
> obsolete value)
>
> 3. subfield letter is the initial (in English) for the thing being
> stored; easy to remember!

+1

Regards,

Galen
-- 
Galen Charlton
Director of Support and Implementation
Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
email:  gmc at esilibrary.com
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell:   +1 404-984-4366
skype:  gmcharlt
web:    http://www.esilibrary.com/
Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & 
http://evergreen-ils.org