[Koha-devel] making facets editable ?

Mathieu Saby mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr
Fri Nov 9 09:33:23 CET 2012


Thank you Jonathan
I will take a look next week. Maybe we could use SolR facet 
configuration as a model for Zebra?
If I don't understand how to do that I will ask for some advice to you 
or Claire...

Regards,
Mathieu

Jonathan Druart a écrit :
> Hello Mathieu
>
> It is already possible to configure indexes via the koha interface. 
> But only for Solr :)
> You can have a look at Bug 8233.
> Switch your syspref SearchEngine to "Solr" and go on the search engine 
> configuration page (admin/searchengine/solr/indexes.pl 
> <http://indexes.pl>) based on a yaml file.
> You can configure your facetable indexes and on the result page (at 
> opac) you see facets you had selected.
> Look at the module Koha/SearchEngine/Solr/Config.pm and the script 
> opac/search.pl <http://search.pl> (and the tmpl 
> opac-tmpl/prog/en/modules/search/results.tt <http://results.tt>).
>
> Regards,
> Jonathan
>
>
> 2012/10/31 Mathieu Saby <mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr 
> <mailto:mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr>>
>
>     Hello
>
>     Currently, facets are defined in perl code.
>     This is not good for unimarc libraries : a recent improvement is
>     specific to Marc21 and could not been transposed in Unimarc,
>     because the information is not encoded in the same field in all
>     unimarc libraries.
>     I'm referring to
>     http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 "Add
>     item type to facet list" : there is no universal Unimarc field for
>     "item type" :-(
>     The solution could be a system preference for this peculiar facet.
>
>     But if a development is needed I would prefer a more generic one,
>     to make all facets fully editable, so that each library could
>     define its own facets matching the (sub)fields of its choice,
>     without editing perl files.
>     Do you think it would be a good idea ?
>     I think there is 2 way for doing this :
>     - create a configuration file (yaml ?)
>     - create a (big) syspref
>     Which choice would be the best regarding performances (and other
>     criteria I did not think of...) ?
>
>     Regards,
>     Mathieu Saby
>     Rennes 2 University
>
>     -- 
>     Mathieu Saby
>     Service d'Informatique Documentaire
>     Service Commun de Documentation
>     Université Rennes 2
>     Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65 <tel:02%2099%2014%2012%2065>
>     Courriel : mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr
>     <mailto:mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Koha-devel mailing list
>     Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org
>     <mailto:Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org>
>     http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
>     website : http://www.koha-community.org/
>     git : http://git.koha-community.org/
>     bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
>
>


-- 
Mathieu Saby
Service d'Informatique Documentaire
Service Commun de Documentation
Université Rennes 2
Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65
Courriel : mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20121109/c4c46778/attachment.html>


More information about the Koha-devel mailing list