[Koha-devel] feature for bugzilla ?

[Paul A]

For the sake of clarity, can Koha users assume that "to obsolete" a comment 
does not mean that it is deleted?

Also, I'm not sure what "untagged" means. Would it be possible to give a 
schema of how bugs, git-bz, wherever, would allow someone to follow the 
original bug/enhancement through to its conclusion?

Thanks and regards,
Paul

At 10:02 AM 12/21/2015 +1300, Liz Rea wrote:
>Maybe obsolete the comment of the patch that git-bz obsoletes?
>
>We almost always (almost.) leave the original test plan in the signed
>off patch, so I'm not certain we lose anything by obsoleting the comment
>of the obsoleted patch.
>
>It's probably worth noting that a comment can be untagged too.
>
>Liz
>
>On 19/12/15 04:11, Owen Leonard wrote:
> >>> next step : obsoleting comment when you obsolete a patch ;-)
> >>> (or even: always obsolete comments that are patch upload)
> >> Perhaps git-bz could be made to do this?
> > I don't think we should always obsolete comments on attachments. I
> > like seeing the comment which is added by a patch because I want to be
> > able to see the test plan in the commit message.
> >
> >   -- Owen
> >
>
>--
>--
>Liz Rea
>Catalyst.Net Limited
>Level 6, Catalyst House,
>150 Willis Street, Wellington.
>P.O Box 11053, Manners Street,
>Wellington 6142
>
>GPG: B149 A443 6B01 7386 C2C7 F481 B6c2 A49D 3726 38B7
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Koha-devel mailing list
>Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org
>http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
>website : http://www.koha-community.org/
>git : http://git.koha-community.org/
>bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

---
Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation,
research and education through the written word and the arts.
<http://NavalMarineArchive.com> and <http://UltraMarine.ca>