11 Mar
2016
11 Mar
'16
2:53 p.m.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15883 --- Comment #6 from Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5)
I'd prefer the contrary: update all existing occurrences of [% INCLUDE 'doc-head-close.inc' %] with [% INCLUDE 'doc-head-close.old.inc' %] # s/old/whatever
That's fine with me. I wonder if the name of the "old" include should reflect the version? I'm concerned that we are going to end up with doc-head-close.old.inc, doc-head-close.older.inc, and doc-head-close.even-older.inc if newer jQuery upgrades start getting added before the last upgrade is complete! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.