http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10067 Viktor Sarge <viktor.sarge@regionhalland.se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viktor.sarge@regionhalland. | |se --- Comment #4 from Viktor Sarge <viktor.sarge@regionhalland.se> --- I've been giving this some thought and I don't mind the current workflow where you get a chance to tell a patron that the book will have a shorter loan period than usual. But the problem is that decreaseLoanHighHolds hooks into duedatespec and overwrites it. So even if you auto clear after using highholds you will lose any date you had entered manually. My two cents is that this could be solved with this workflow: 1) When highholds is active pick upp anything stored in "duedatespec" and stick it into the new parameter "specifiedDueDateToRestore" 2) Let highholds overwrite duedatespec as it currently do. 3) When circulation.pl finds a non empty specifiedDueDateToRestore parameter stick this back into duedatespec. This way the due date from highholds will be the one off value it's supposed to be and manually defined due dates will be restored. I've been looking at 10067 from a few different angles and this is what I can come up with that does'nt change peoples current workflow. I have yet to discover any fatal flaws with this approach althoguh there might be several for all I know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.