http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8392 Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nengard@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
Shouldn't we have a rule like "check AgeLimit if there is a birthdate, otherwise, it's OK" ?
I wondered the same thing when I was testing it, but I think it makes sense. Using BorrowerMandatoryFields acts as a de-facto system preference for choosing whether or not the age limit should be enforced. If I want to enforce the age limit on a patron category I want to enforce it on all patrons, not just patrons for whom I have entered a birth date.
It's a change in the behaviour I was not aware. I think it has been introduced in 3.6. I don't see anything about that in the docs: http://manual.koha-community.org/3.8/en/patscirc.html#patcats Adding Nicole. Nicole, please read comment 9 = age limit is checked only if birthdate is a borrower mandatory field ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.