1 Jun
2013
1 Jun
'13
4:33 a.m.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5858 --- Comment #22 from Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com> --- (In reply to comment #9)
I am not sure deleting them is a good idea - I would have to test it, but is there a chance we loose data if someone imports data that uses fields that are not defined in the default framework? I think I would prefer to see them hidden and marked [OBSOLETE] to be sure no data can be lost.
it looks like the official MARC21 spec does this too -> http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdlist.html ie: it does not delete old fields/subfields, but just marks them [OBSOLETE] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.