http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9717 Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cbrannon@cdalibrary.org --- Comment #5 from Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org> --- I think it should be up to the library (consortium) as to what should be counted as local use. I can agree on both sides about staff handling books that are transferred. I think the absolute best solution for this issue is that there needs to be a new admin option on what to count as local use. One could argue, if scanning a book that is returning from a transfer is local use, than why wouldn't inventory scanning? Why is handling and scanning in one situation different from another? But then again, if you are only wanting to get a count of actual patron uses outside of issues, why count non patron handling? Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.