https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33277 --- Comment #24 from Frank Hansen <frank.hansen@ub.lu.se> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #23)
(In reply to Frank Hansen from comment #22)
I would still like to comment on ind2=4. As for us, we treat them as local subject headings only and they are not included in any thesaurus. Therefore, I would prefer not to see any authority records for either 008/11=| (or 008/11=n) in our catalog, even if the format allows it.
Are you saying you won't import those records - or you want those records to be ignored when linking? The former sounds easy enough, the second seems it would require a syspref to not link those
Sorry if I was unclear. Records with ind2=4 is not exported from National Library catalogue at first. So they will not be imported to our local catalogue. We are not planning to create any either manually or automatically.
I also want to comment on 040$f. According to the Swedish cataloguing guidelines here ... So I question about allowing to omit 040$f when 008/11=z.
This sounds like a comment on cataloging standards, and maybe something that can be set in frameworks. But I don't think we need code for this?
Maybe not. We will use 040$f to specify system/thesaurus conventions in any case. I just want to make sure that it not have a negative impact on filtering on thesauruses if we omit 040$f.
What causes the most trouble for me is, as mentioned earlier, that non-6XX fields are hardcoded to LCSH. This creates problems for libraries outside the US, as we typically do not use LCSH names. I wish we could skip thesaurus search for those fields.
These patches do now skip searching thesaurus when linking non-subject fields
I'm testing bug33277 and what I have seen so far looks good. (both ES and Zebra) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.