http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9075 M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |ASSIGNED --- Comment #15 from M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #14)
If "Material type" is correct should it not be changed in all views? The term "type" appears in OPAC search results, OPAC detail page, staff client search results, and staff client detail page.
Hm. I agree that it is at least inconsistent to not apply the same change to staff client results. I will resend this patch. Note that the non-XSLT view in staff does not include this same Type-line (in results and detail). As for OPAC, it might be different. Here we come into the discussion if a more precise wording in staff is still appropriate for the general public of the opac. (Similar example: should you say authority search in opac). Before doing that change, I would like some feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.