http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13157 Bug ID: 13157 Summary: improving facet definitions for unimarc Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: gmcharlt@gmail.com Reporter: mathsabypro@gmail.com QA Contact: testopia@bugs.koha-community.org The new code for facets calculation could probably be more precise for unimarc (in biblio-koha-indexdefs.xml) - for series, 410 tag is probably better than 225 - the date and place subdivisions 6XX$y and 6XX$z could be indexed (in su-geo and su-chrono) - the subdivisionn $x is indexed for 606, but all 6XX$x could also be indexed (in su-to) - 5XX are not subjects, so I'm not sure that indexing them in su-ut is good (but we should check in ccl.properties how this index is defined). Anyway, I always found that indexing 5XX was a weird idea... and there is maybe a mistake for 995$b - holdingbranch (should be 995$c) M. Saby -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.