https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41608 --- Comment #17 from Arthur Suzuki <arthur.suzuki@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #16)
(In reply to Arthur Suzuki from comment #12)
So yeah I think maybe it's a bug. It probably makes sense to AND different types of facets/filters, but when the type is the same it should probably be ORed.
That is what we want to propose with this bug :)
Ok but the way to do that would be in how the "limit" parameter is processed rather than changing the CCL query.
yep, I just got the implementation working, it is indeed much simpler and the compatibility with the current behaviour of searching is better preserved (QueryFuzzy, Truncate, etc...) I will do some more checks and post a bit later. Thx for the hints! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.