https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18360 --- Comment #23 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #21)
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #20)
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #18)
Taking a closer look - maybe also to be handled on a separate bug:
Why is it necessary to delete the record first? I could imagine libraries still having the record with older items or other linked orders.
+ alert( _("Please delete the linked bibliographic record first.") );
Probably had in mind to prevent 'ghost records' in the catalog. Created by Acquisition and now having no links anymore. Could imagine that there will be different opinions here. Maybe still move that to a new report?
Yes, it was not meant as a blocker here. Just wondering about reasoning. I'll add additional_work_needed as a reminder for this loose end.
Bug 36731 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.