https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39517 --- Comment #6 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #5)
(In reply to David Cook from comment #3)
There's no guarantee that it's a book. It could be an electronic resource, it could be a report, research study, a pamphlet, a thesis, a play, etc.
It seems that it is not so obvious what should be included in the "Book" category. Here is another, more rigorous (perhaps too rigorous) attempt, based on the nature of the content and literary form from field 008. (BTW, an e-book is still a book).
I'm not sure I understand this one. If 24-27 Nature of contents is "No specified nature of contents" and 34 Biographic is "No attempt to code", then it's a book?
Ultimately, if we cannot agree on what a book is, we should remove the "Book" category from the schema.org options in the XSLT stylesheet.
Yeah not a bad idea... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.