27 Sep
2021
27 Sep
'21
8:19 p.m.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28761 --- Comment #9 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #8)
I noticed this the other day.. should we also be falling back to item-type level not for loan values when the local not for loan is not set or set to allow loans.. which value should take precedence if both are set?
Otherwise, this looks pretty reasonable to me.
Not sure I understand the question correctly, do you mean item vs. record leven not for loan? Then I think if both are set, we should use the description from item level. To me it makes sense that the more specific should win. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.