https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27981 Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.druart+koha@gmail. | |com Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA --- Comment #35 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> ---
A 'duplication' option is add to svc/bib and rancor passes the parameter, the basic editor simply removes the field
I dont think that we should go that way. The changes to svc/bib do not look good to me. The strange d parameter in the path svc/bib/d1 is rather hacky. Personally, I would rather go away from the whole path_info tric to get the biblionumber and just have a real biblionumber parameter. But we should not spend too much time on this old service script when we have an API. Instead of changing svc/bib, could you move the change to where rancor saves a duplicated record? Adding Jonathan to the discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.