http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8587 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #7)
I have to disagree on this. I don't think hardcoding the number and just translating the word year/years is the right way to go. I'm sure there's a language out there where the number is after or something like that.
I think it is possible to do that when you translate your po file.
I don't understand bug 8407. Maybe translation for [IF] inside options is broken inside loops, but it's working for me in this patch.
Yes, it works :) But the problem is the script xt/tt_valid.t does not accept this syntax. Then the test fails.
3/ Fonctionnaly what is the goal of this field? Indeed, you don't use this field, just store and display.
Good question. We use it with a saved sql report here attached. Anyway I wasn't really expecting this to be accepted. I think i'm fine leaving it here as Failed QA and to be an option if something needs it.
humm... ok :) But if this development is useful for some people it is a good idea to include it into Koha. Chris, what do you think about this development ? Do you think we want it ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.