http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5262 Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> 2010-12-29 16:01:03 UTC --- Marking this as an enhancement. A review of the MARC21 and authority specs shows the following: - in many cases, one or both indicator values in the bib heading could in fact be set from the authority record's main heading field. - there are two main cases: 1. Directly copying an indicator value over, e.g., for the form of name or for non-filing characters. However, the indicator position in the authority record doesn't necessary correspond to the value used in the bib field; a good example of this is the nonfiling characters indicator for uniform title headings. Consequently, the indicator mapping should be configured somewhere. 2. Setting the thesaurus type (or source of term) based on the thesaurus specified in the authority record. For MARC21 subject headings, this could entail setting the 6xx indicator 2 *and* a subfield $2; for UNIMARC headings, setting $2 appears to be sufficient. The two cases could be treated as separate enhancements, of course. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.