https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42639 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #16 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Bo Gustavsson from comment #15)
(In reply to David Nind from comment #14)
I've signed off, but I do have a question.
Should "None specified" be a valid option?
Before the patch, if "None specified" is selected, there is no value in the database for the sex field.
After the patch, you can't choose "None specified".
I don’t think “None specified” should be selectable. I find it more intuitive than having it pre-filled when it isn’t an allowed option.
“None specified” is, of course, selectable and should be the default value when “Gender (sex)” is not marked as required.
I disagree. It's possible to select "none specified" now and it's a valid option for us if a patron chooses not to disclose that information. Other is used for "divers" in German, so not a replacement here. This change of behavior would cause problems for a lot of libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.