https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37054 --- Comment #81 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #80)
Looking back over my latest comments on bug 26129, I can see that I think `configurations` table might be too generic. But... I'm open to the idea. The cool thing about the `configurations` table is that if we decided later it wasn't 100% to purpose it would be easy to migrate to something more specific as well.
Personally, I think the idea of a `ui_branches_themes` or `ui_themes_branches` might be an idea. We could move "OPAC information", "Specific OPAC JS", and "Specific OPAC CSS" to that table. If we give each theme a file-system friendly name, we could potentially map this to the filesystem so that libraries could easily link in JS and CSS files as well.
I'm not too fussed on the actual implementation, but yeah a separate table would be good. I have been thinking for a little while that having some ui_* specific tables could be good. Tables like `columns_settings` and `tables_settings` for instance would be better organised with a `ui_` prefix I suspect. Could be good to break out a lot of system preferences into ui_* table(s) instead of being in system_preferences as well... But anyway... -- Trying to say you've got my support, Tomas! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.