https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21946 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |In Discussion CC| |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de --- Comment #43 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #42)
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #41)
Forget that, I had the new version in mind (NULL in DB instead of '*'). At some point we really will need it (bug 15522) in I think, we will need to stop building stuffs that will conflict with it. Why not implement on top of it instead?
I think that will need work at this point.
I believe the idea was to take care of the architecture, make sure it comes out as we planned without any great changes in structure during QA etc. Then work on the interface.
I understand Joubu's point of view. We started moving from issuingrules to circulation rules following what I think BWS has started. But at the same time we keep adding to issuingrules... that's not good. I think we need to decide which way to go, otherwise we will create conflicts and waste developer time. The patch set is quite heavy, only have one comment so far: Could we use parent_itemtype or parent_itype instead of parent_type? I think it could get confusing fast especially if we want to introduce similar in other spots. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.