http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10187 David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook@prosentient.com.au --- Comment #4 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to M. de Rooy from comment #3)
Would it be more clear to make the scope of this report little bit wider?
1/season (spring, summer, etc.) [do not mention quarter anymore] 1/quarter (three months) [if quarter is harder, we could also eliminate it]
BTW I am curious: Why not let every 3 months just cover both?
Extending this report with: 1/week= weekly 1/month = monthly 1/2 weeks is not completely clear (0,5 or 2?): 1/two weeks idem: 1/three weeks, 1/two three four months, 1/two years BTW: What do you think of every instead of 1/ So: every 2 weeks, every 3 months etc.
each year or annually instead of 1/year 2/year: every 6 months, semiannual (?) 2/day= twice a day
Another step: We could also just say the frequency is two weeks etc. instead of prefix 75% of the list with 'every'. So list: daily, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, .., 4 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
What do you think?
I might be wrong, but I think it might be important to have separate periodicities, as they might be linked to different number patterns/formulas? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.