https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31123 --- Comment #21 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #17)
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #16)
Subfield `z` is often 'public note' and subfield `x` is often 'nonpublic note' for other fields.. I did wonder about supporting subfield `u` specifically for a 'uri' to allow for linking to more details or a content policy or some such.
a, x an z certainly make sense. Not sure what is better: keep it simple or make it a complete list. Both could be options.
The 5xx vary a lot in the number of subfields, 500 for example has almost none/just the basics: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd500.html
Rebased. Suggestion: let's use a complete list? That way libraries can use whatever. Also maybe good in case of UNIMARC? Did a tiny rebase: conflict in .pref -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.