https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20310 --- Comment #18 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to paxed from comment #17)
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #16)
(In reply to paxed from comment #5)
Comment on attachment 73805 [details] [review] [review] [review] Bug 20310: Introduce Koha::Biblio->host_record
Shouldn't this also check that the 003 fields match? AFAIUI, 001+003 is unique, 001 is not guaranteed to be - because you could import data from different organization.
Added a check with pref MARCOrgCode
But if you import data from another org then the orgcode (field 003) for those records won't be your org, but something else. You should match the 773$w orgcode to the host biblio 003
Hi paxed, I understand your point. But I am not so sure if we do these checks somewhere in Koha. In my proposal I ignore (Remote)x and only look at z or (My)z. If record z from (My)z is found, I do not check if 001==z and 003==My. Similarly, if record x from (Remote)x would be in our system (which I don't know) we also don't know if 001==x and 003==Remote. Practical question would be too: Do we really want to check all 773 contents and pull all 001, 003s? Since this logic is all about record control number handling in Koha and imo outside the scope of this report, we c/should move further refinements to a new report. But I have doubts about what we should check. This is a discussion on its own.. Thx for your feedback though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.