http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7186 --- Comment #5 from Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com> 2011-12-03 00:07:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2)
In my opinion this information is not necessary to display.
agreed, its not necessary - is that enough reason to not allow the patch to be committed? is the 'OPAC cover-images' feature necessary, too?
It seems more promotional than informational,
the info is *both* promotional and informational, thats why i did the patch...
and anyway I'm not sure we should be pulling data directly from a third-party source for this.
why not? we pull 'data directly from a third-party source' when fetching cover images fyi: ohloh's 'terms and conditions' allow this specific usage any other problems with the patch? :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.