http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7455 Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |In Discussion --- Comment #13 from Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com> --- (In reply to comment #12)
+ uses subfield '@' replacing by '00' behavior like in biblios. + fixedfield variable was missing in subfields, in both authities and biblios, => test it with a field < 010.
Is the change to the display in the bibliographic editor intentional? Personally, I preferred the old display because it felt more consistent, and I can't see that the new display gains us anything. I'll post a screenshot in a moment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.