https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16343 --- Comment #21 from Héctor Eduardo Castro Avalos <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #19)
Is it intentional to not display 100$t any longer with this patch? Can you please check? It displays without this patch, 700$t displays with and without, but sequence is fixed.
Hi Katrin. I intencional did it since subfield $t is only used in 7XX fields in MARC bibliographic. This subfield is only used in MARC authority. If a librarian use some authorized access point with $t (name-title) subfield in bib record, the uniform title is placed in 240$a field. But if some library use 1XX$t I can include it. Regards PS: This is a policy that Library of Congress don't want to change neither LCRI nor LC-PCC PS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.