https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36506 Nick Clemens (kidclamp) <nick@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #192931|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #47 from Nick Clemens (kidclamp) <nick@bywatersolutions.com> --- Created attachment 194117 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=194117&action=edit Bug 36506: (QA follow-up) Add test for missing circulation rule This adds a test case to verify that when no lost_item_processing_fee circulation rule exists for a branch/itemtype combination, the system correctly defaults to 0 (no processing fee charged). The test confirms: - No PROCESSING account line is created when the rule is missing - The LOST fee is still created normally (only processing fee affected) - The // 0 fallback in C4::Accounts::chargelostitem works correctly Test plan: 1. prove t/db_dependent/Accounts.t 2. Verify all tests pass, including the new "missing circulation rule" test case Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@openfifth.co.uk> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.