Paul -- I think as long as the commit message identifies the target as 3.0-specific, there is not much benefit from a separate patches list for 3.0. I might defer to HDL on this, since he is the end recipient/manager of those patches, but I think the community of reviewers should be the same. Since 3.0-specific traffic is likely to be small relative to HEAD's traffic, I don't think it is much of an imposition on the current list. --Joe On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Paul POULAIN <paul.poulain@free.fr> wrote:
Hello,
atm, all patches are sent to patches@koha.org They are supposed to be relevant for HEAD. but : how will we deal with patches that are 3.0 only ?
For example : updates of the french translation. They are 3.0 specific, and can't be merged in HEAD. In a few weeks, I think we will have some bugs that are 3.0 only, and irrelevant in head (due to some structure/code/features changes)
so, how will we deal with those ? I once suggested to have a patches30@koha.org mailbox, this proposal has not been accepted. But I come back with the general idea, as I think it's something we will face quickly. So, any idea welcomed...
-- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc NOUVEAU TELEPHONE : 04 91 81 35 08