Hi Zeno, thanks for your suggestion. In fact, UNIMARC and MARC21 mappings are quite different. There is a french recommandation for item management : Recommandation 995. http://www.adbdp.asso.fr/Recommandation-995-donnees-d It is not a norm nor is it used on a wider scale than France, from what I can tell. But it is quite a requirement for french public libraries. So for French audience, we stick to that recommandation. But telling more on differences and suggestions to converge would be helpful. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT Zeno Tajoli a écrit :
Hi to all,
when you transfer your dato into Koha, you need to select a MARC standard (MARC21/UNIMAC) and insert the holdings info.
For MARC21 many answer on the list say:"insert holdings info into 952". But for Unimarc ? For Unimarc I think that the french setup is the setup to follow. For Unimarc english setup is a transaltion from frence.
So reading the file installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/framework_DEFAULT.sql I undestand the I need to insert holding info inot 995
Checking also the indexes defintions in the files etc/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/biblios/record.abs etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs
it si clear that other important local and holdings info are: For MARC21 in 999, 942 For Unimarc in 090, 099
The question that I have:
Do we want to mantain different 9xx numbers between Unimarc and MARC21 ? Could we use the French framework defintions as primary source about Unimarc ?
In the next mail I write about indexes.
Bye to all Zeno Tajoli
Zeno Tajoli CILEA - Segrate (MI) tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it (Indirizzo mascherato anti-spam; sostituisci quanto tra AT con @)
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel