On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:02:18AM +0100, Paul POULAIN wrote:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/koha/
about CVS : I will now use only savannah for 2.2 cvs updates. for head, I suggest to decide the same. Yep ... I concur.
Note we can't "close" cvs on sourceforce. We just have to double check that noone uses it anymore. + post a link everywhere to explain the move to savannah. Is there anything we should be doing to prevent developers from committing in both places? ie, turn off write privs for all the general developers?
note about cvs/arch/subversion... i think we will create enough trouble not to add a tool change ! Yep...my impression is that until there is a clear leader in the 'alternative to CVS' revision management systems we should stick with CVS.
Cheers, -- Joshua Ferraro VENDOR SERVICES FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE President, Technology migration, training, maintenance, support LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS jmf@liblime.com |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS