On 2004-07-28 16:55:02 +0100 Owen Leonard <oleonard@athenscounty.lib.oh.us> wrote:
rel_2_0 is mostly dead for development, so there's no point downloading it IMO.
And I think he thought (as I did) that you meant that it should no longer be provided for download *at all*. It is obviously necessary for there to be places where anyone can download the latest stable release!
I only mean the rel_2_0 branch *of CVS* is dead. Do not download rel_2_0 from CVS if you can do anything better. Working on it will be a minor nuisance. Download it from arch or a tarball. Yes, anything else would be absurd. I have updated/reintroduced some templates to do with the reports. Getting reports working well again is the main focus of my bugfixing right now. Do I need to notify translators and wait for translations to be completed, or release 2.0.1 now (with a few very nice bugfixes for installation) and release 2.0.2 with any updated translations? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL; Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast