Re: [Koha-devel] koha 2.0.1beta2 uploaded - Checked by Vexira DEMO vers
Stephen questioning moving 2.0.x out of CVS, I think.
Actually, I think Stephen was asking whether you comments meant that you thought 2.0.x should no longer me made available for download at all, not whether it should be moved out of CVS. You wrote:
rel_2_0 is mostly dead for development, so there's no point downloading it IMO.
And I think he thought (as I did) that you meant that it should no longer be provided for download *at all*. It is obviously necessary for there to be places where anyone can download the latest stable release! -- Owen
On 2004-07-28 16:55:02 +0100 Owen Leonard <oleonard@athenscounty.lib.oh.us> wrote:
rel_2_0 is mostly dead for development, so there's no point downloading it IMO.
And I think he thought (as I did) that you meant that it should no longer be provided for download *at all*. It is obviously necessary for there to be places where anyone can download the latest stable release!
I only mean the rel_2_0 branch *of CVS* is dead. Do not download rel_2_0 from CVS if you can do anything better. Working on it will be a minor nuisance. Download it from arch or a tarball. Yes, anything else would be absurd. I have updated/reintroduced some templates to do with the reports. Getting reports working well again is the main focus of my bugfixing right now. Do I need to notify translators and wait for translations to be completed, or release 2.0.1 now (with a few very nice bugfixes for installation) and release 2.0.2 with any updated translations? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL; Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast
participants (2)
-
MJ Ray -
Owen Leonard