My concern with Transifex as a hosted solution has to do with the *massive* updates I have to do. If everything was in one .PO, and you were translating one language, it's no itch, but if you have to upload each .po for each language....no way will I agree to that; we'll do it ourselves first. I'll be taking a look at this this weekend, but I wouldn't count on a switch prior to the 3.12 release. We're in the home stretch; I don't want to disrupt the translators at this part of their work. On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>wrote:
Hello translators,
During the hackfest in Marseille, 2 people worked on transifex with french translations. Their opinion is that we *must* leave pootle in favour of transifex. Both tools shouldn't be compared in terms of usability, features, speed of use,...
What's the next step ? How could we reach an agreement on using this tool instead of pootle ? It seems a transifex server can be setup from github or we could decide to use transifex.com directly, (which is free of charge for OpenSource projects)
My opinion here is that we could stard with transifex.com, as we can always download all translations, we can easily deal with any evil change, but I'm open to others arguments (and I don't apply to manage all the translation things, so our translation manager has an important opinion ;-) )
-- Paul POULAIN - BibLibre http://www.biblibre.com Free & Open Source Softwares for libraries Koha, Drupal, Piwik, Jasper
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/