You could send a patch/pull request to codespell if you wanted Or you could ignore it, because we don't run that script over the t/ dir Chris On 8 March 2016 at 17:14, Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
$ koha-qa.pl –v 2 –c 4 ... FAIL t/db_dependent/Filter_MARC_ViewPolicy.t OK critic OK forbidden patterns OK pod FAIL spelling isnt ==> isn't OK valid ...
$ grep isnt t/db_dependent/Filter_MARC_ViewPolicy.t isnt( $unfiltered_record->field('020'), undef, isnt( $unfiltered_record->field('008'), undef, isnt( $filtered_record->field('020'), undef, isnt( $unfiltered_record->field('020'), undef, isnt( $filtered_record->field('008'), undef, isnt( $unfiltered_record->field('008'), undef,
Spelling checks should exclude “isnt(“, right?
GPML, Mark Tompsett
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/