On 5/11/2011 1:38 PM, Nicole Engard wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Chris Cormack<chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> wrote:
Options as I see them 1/ Continue with the current workflow, patches signed off, passed qa, then into master, with the goal to increase the rate patches are signed off This is my vote! I know it takes more work and more time for features to be approved, but I'm for a more stable, tested Koha. Nicole says it spot-on; the current process requires some more time, but it is *well* worth it, in terms of a running product, IMO. +1 for option 1.
I also strongly approve of Chris's leadership of this transition phase--you've done a great job, Chris. It's been an adjustment, for everyone, getting to the slightly-more-challenging process, but most folks I have talked to feel that it does make for a better product. -- *D Ruth Bavousett* Lead Migration Specialist ByWater Solutions Support and Consulting for Open Source Software VISIT US AT ALA: BOOTH 732 Headquarters: Santa Barbara, CA Office: Washington, DC Phone/Fax (888)900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ruth@bywatersolutions.com