I can basically reiterate what Katrin said; we rely on this behavior and I wouldn't want it to change. Of course, implementing an opt-in syspref is a fine alternative. Depending on what's appropriate to your situation, it seems like you could just create a visible placeholder item as a workaround to get the bib to display. Best, ERIC PHETTEPLACE Systems Librarian libraries.cca.edu | vault.cca.edu | 510.594.3660 5212 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94618 1111 8th St., San Francisco, CA 94107 Preferred Pronoun(s): he/him :(){ :|: & };: On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com> wrote:
El jue., 27 jul. 2017 a las 13:00, Katrin Fischer (< Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>) escribió:
Hi Tomas,
we rely heavily on the described behaviour to hide the record if all items are hidden. It seems logical to me - what will a user do with a record, that has no items? They can't place a hold, they don't know where to find it, which library owns copies etc. To me it seems more confusing then helpful.
I think we shouldn't change the behaviour, especially because it has always worked like described and libraries might be unpleasantly surprised by a sudden change. Having the different behaviour as a configuration option would make sense.
Yeap, I filed this bug to deal with this: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18989
Regards -- Tomás Cohen Arazi Theke Solutions (https://theke.io <http://theke.io/>) ✆ +54 9351 3513384 <+54%209%20351%20351-3384> GPG: B2F3C15F
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/