12 Nov
2005
12 Nov
'05
8:06 a.m.
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:10:07AM +0100, Paul POULAIN wrote: > >and why are we moving to it? > For 2 reasons : > - sourceforge has many perf problems (probably due to their succes). > Sometimes, the CVS is down, sometimes it's the mailing list. And anytime > (or almost, CVS is really slowwwww) I am (small) developper on another > savannah project (dolibarr), and I can say I was stunned by the speed > the 1st time I updated my CVS copy on savannah ! I thought sourceforge > CVS speed was the standard cvs speed, that's not true at all !!! > > - for philosophical reasons : why do we work on a OSS software using a > non-OSS platform ? > snip... > That's a strong acceleration to the migration. We have to decide quickly > to move (or not to move, but I don't see why we would not !) to avoid > having 2 cvs active & unsynch ! I think Paul's reasoning is dead on. Why are we developing a GNU project on a non-OSS platform? And we've all experienced annoying lag with sourceforge. Paul, I've signed up at savannah as 'kados'. Cheers, -- Joshua Ferraro VENDOR SERVICES FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE President, Technology migration, training, maintenance, support LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS jmf@liblime.com |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS