Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
I feel we will never be able to take care of all those bugs, and many if not most of them are related to problems on now-unmaintained versions of Koha. So i'd like to close all of them and mark them "wontfix". Does anyone think it's a bad idea ?
I think it's a good idea to reduce the number of bugs. I don't think bulk closing just because they've not been updated in a while is a good move. It's artificial. Here's what I plan to do, so please beat me to it if you want: "so that we can concentrate on 3.6, I'd systematically check and RESOLVE WONTFIX the ~140 bugs reported not against maintained versions and I'd suggest reclassifying the 771 bugs reported against master as reported against the version which immediately follows the date they were reported." Remember, RESOLVED WONTFIX does not mean it isn't a bug: it just means we don't have anyone who will fix it. Someone can always REOPEN it and ASSIGN it to themselves. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Webmaster, Debian Developer, Past Koha RM, statistician, former lecturer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for various work through http://www.software.coop/