19 Jun
2015
19 Jun
'15
4:39 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Kyle Hall <kyle.m.hall@gmail.com> wrote:
It's been discussed a few times, but I think we need to formalize naming conventions when writing patches for Koha.
The worse offenders are those things that we use many different names for both internally and externally. I think patrons/borrowers/members is the worst offender. List come to mind as well ( previously being virtual shelves ).
I believe that our internal nomenclature should reflect our outward nomenclature. So if the staff and/or OPAC use the term "patron" we should be using the term "patron" in our code as well, especially for namespaces.
What does everyone think?
+1 Kind Regards, Chris