On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com> wrote:
Some have suggested we switch to Plone and just use the standard Plone template;
That's my vote: we need the functionalities sooner rather than later, especialy as far as the Koha doc for version 3 is concerned. I agree with Roberto that the issues should be divided: the problems with the proposed Plone templates should not stop us from moving forward with the plan to switch to Plone. Nicolas
others have suggested we pick one of the submitted designs even though we didn't like them, just to move things forward; others have suggested we run another contest or perhaps just select someone to pay to design a koha.org site that the community is happy with. So there are lots of ideas, but I think most of us have been too busy to execute them.
So Koha community, how shall we proceed?
Cheers,
-- Joshua Ferraro SUPPORT FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE CEO migration, training, maintenance, support LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS jmf@liblime.com |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel