Paul Poulain wrote:
* do you think any decision will result from those meetings ? how to manage decision in a double time meeting ?
One option would be to use the Crowd Wise decision-making process. The full thing is http://www.neweconomics.org/projects/crowd-wise but summary: gather all ideas plus option 0 (do nothing) if possible, carry out a de Borda (preference) voting round 1, merge/amend/consolidate ideas, voting round 2 if needed. We could do round 1 in meeting 1 and round 2 in meeting 2. Would that be OK? I'll ask for a co-op member (maybe me) to count the votes if it would help... I don't think our meetbot does votes. I see the great Magnus has made a wiki page already. Please visit it and flesh out with facts for the discussions! Who's done or wants to do what on each of the three points? http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Developers_IRC_Meeting,_February_25,_201... Thanks, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/