October 2007 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 1363] tag-level mandatory flag kills marc editor
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1363 paul.poulain(a)free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|P2 |PATCH-Sent ------- Comment #1 from paul.poulain(a)free.fr 2007-10-05 08:02 ------- This bug is no more relevant. But there was still something strange with the mandatory fields. In UNIMARC, there are only a few of them. What is strange with them is that, when a field is noted "mandatory", nothing is written on subfield level. So a field can be mandatory and no subfield entered. What does it mean ? I have changed the behaviour a little : any mandatory field will now have all it's subfields expanded by default. But if you don't have set a subfield mandatory, you'll still be able to save without entering anything. Let me know how a MARC21 librarian sees that behaviour... suggest a correct behaviour if it is not correct. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1176] Librarians can delete records that still have items attached
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1176 ------- Comment #6 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2007-10-05 07:37 ------- Is this a javascript-only solution? A destructive act like deletion should not depend on javascript for prevention. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1355] contact informations don't appear on profil
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1355 oleonard(a)myacpl.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #2 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2007-10-05 07:31 ------- I see no display problems for a child without guarantor in 3.0 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1334] 2.2.8 - Minor useability issues in opac-passwd.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1334 oleonard(a)myacpl.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal ------- Comment #2 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2007-10-05 07:23 ------- I'd also classify this as a bug, not an enhancement. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1279] Detail page should display error message for invalid biblionumbers
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1279 ------- Comment #2 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2007-10-05 07:16 ------- Still a problem in 3.0. Here's what the user sees: [ ] / * Description: No physical items for this record ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1469] New: clear reminder after a search
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1469 Summary: clear reminder after a search Product: Koha Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh URL: http://opac-search.pl OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: OPAC AssignedTo: jmf(a)kados.org ReportedBy: pascale.nalon(a)ensmp.fr QAContact: koha-bugs(a)nongnu.org In the OPAC, when you have a list of results for a search, at the top of the list there's a reminder of your search. It's usefull, but it's not in natural language...it's a shame, for ordinary users. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1255] Debarred patrons can renew via the OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1255 ------- Comment #2 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2007-10-05 07:13 ------- Confirmed: still a problem in 3.0 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1253] search results for patron name in circulation.pl are sorted case-sensitively
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1253 ------- Comment #3 from oleonard(a)myacpl.org 2007-10-05 07:05 ------- Confirmed in 3.0: BRYAN, Allegra BRYAN, Johnny Bryan, John H. Bryan, Johnny ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1274] problem in UNIMARC Editor, when adding a subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1274 paul.poulain(a)free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #5 from paul.poulain(a)free.fr 2007-10-05 06:59 ------- yep. MARC editor completly rewritted to solve dirty bugs like this one. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1452] Labels for item editor are truncated
by bugzilla-daemon＠pippin.metavore.com 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1452 paul.poulain(a)free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|P3 |PATCH-Sent ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0