May 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 38547] New: Improve the code for the MARC ordering process
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '26

23 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38547 Bug ID: 38547 Summary: Improve the code for the MARC ordering process Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org There are some improvements needed to the code in bug 34355 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 22

[Bug 36549] New: es_indexer_daemon.pl leaks memory
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '26

23 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36549 Bug ID: 36549 Summary: es_indexer_daemon.pl leaks memory Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org background_jobs_worker.pl runs its tasks in child processes which return their memory to the OS when they complete. es_indexer_daemon.pl runs everything in itself which means if it needs to allocate a large amount of memory for an indexing job, it will hold on to that memory allocation for its entire process life. -- I've got an es_indexer_daemon.pl which is using over 1GB of memory. Once it's done with its indexing activity, I'm going to restart it to get it back down to a more reasonable amount of allocated memory. I reckon we should be forking off child processes to do the worker. We don't need many. We just need 1 that is short lived so that it can return the memory back to the OS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 26867] New: Holds to Pull should use cn_sort
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '26

23 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26867 Bug ID: 26867 Summary: Holds to Pull should use cn_sort Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com To recreate: - create three bibs, each with one item. those items should have these call numbers: -- JC43 .G6 1890 -- JC330 .F74 2000 -- JC480 .R63 2006 - place an item level hold on each item - go to Holds To Pull, sort by call number - notice items are order incorrectly, going 330, 43, 480 - use a report to pull the cn_sort values for your 3 items, confirm that ordering by cn_sort in your report correctly orders them 43, 330, 480 We should use cn_sort here to get them in the correct order. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 30557] New: Add ability to create Item lists
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '26

22 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30557 Bug ID: 30557 Summary: Add ability to create Item lists Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: estherm(a)sodaspringsid.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl This is relevant for multi-branch installations. Lists currently appear to be primarily bibliographic lists. This creates a problem when sorting lists by call number. In this scenario there may be multiple items from different libraries using different call number schema attached to a single bibliographic record. The list cannot be sorted accurately by call number. It would be helpful if there was an option for an item based list. In this scenario items are added to a list for a specific branch. The call number sort will then sort correctly because the call number schema will be consistent for the branch. An item list would display the same information as a bibliographic list with the exception of additional branches which may also have the item. A typical use case would a library creating an item list, sort by call number, and then use that list to go to the shelf to pull the items in order. This is currently not possible in a multi-branch installation without a bit of work. It would require downloading the list and then cleaning up the list to be useful for this kind of work. It may be possible to create a report that will do this, but it would be a nice added functionality in the List tool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 51

[Bug 19442] New: add patron attributes into the patron card creator
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '26

22 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19442 Bug ID: 19442 Summary: add patron attributes into the patron card creator Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Work to be done: 1 - Add the ability to define fields as attribute.CODE in the card creator template 2 - When these codes are found replace them with the correct value for the patron -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 39386] New: UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin and UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckout do not work
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '26

22 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39386 Bug ID: 39386 Summary: UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin and UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckout do not work Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: stephanie.etallaz(a)univ-cotedazur.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Test plan: 1 - Set UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin to 2: 0 2 - Set UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckout to _ALL_: 0: 2 3 - Check out a book -> Its notforloan status isn't set to 2 4 - Check in the book -> Its notforloan status isn't set to 0 and you don't get a notification -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 38345] New: Remove support for OpenSearch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38345 Bug ID: 38345 Summary: Remove support for OpenSearch Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Truth is our test suite has been exploding consistently when trying to launch OpenSearch: * https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Main_OS2/ * https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Main_OS1/ This has some precedent discussion on [issue 429](https://gitlab.com/koha-community/koha-testing-docker/-/issues/429) in `KTD` project issues. We are not going to remove it, I guess. But some noise is needed as people using OpenSearch in production don't seem to care we are not being able to run the test suite, so probably promising some 'OpenSearch support' that we cannot guarantee in any way. And if there's a problem with OpenSearch, we (devs) cannot launch a working environment to fix/test. My two cents on this matter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 70

[Bug 39337] New: Use SQL field to apply OpacSuppression in OAI-PMH
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39337 Bug ID: 39337 Summary: Use SQL field to apply OpacSuppression in OAI-PMH Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 37713, 38330 This is a follow-up to bug 37713 and bug 38330. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37713 [Bug 37713] OAI-PMH - Honour OpacSuppression syspref https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38330 [Bug 38330] Make bib-level suppression a biblio table field instead of part of a marc tag -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 35

[Bug 38368] New: Background jobs: Batch item record deletion to list failed/succeeded items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38368 Bug ID: 38368 Summary: Background jobs: Batch item record deletion to list failed/succeeded items Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hanna.ikonen(a)sivistys.mikkeli.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently background jobs do not list on visible record the items which have been handled. This causes issues especially when the background job fails, for example in batch item record deletion. Trying to solve which items have been worked with, you need to use several different reports. That means a lot of work hours, especially if, for example, the failed background job contains a lot of deleted items. My proposition is, that the background job -list would show which items were handled in the background whether it has failed or not. It would also be helpful if it showed information why it has failed/which item has caused the failure. It would standardize the information/notification system with the other batch processing jobs which list the things that have been worked on. To test: 1. Go to Administration and click Manage Jobs. 2. Select Status as "Failed" and Type "Batch item record deletion". 3. Open a failed background job. 4. Report only lists the job as failed, while "Detailed messages" is empty”. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 35052] New: OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord system preference should be considered on index time instead
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35052 Bug ID: 35052 Summary: OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord system preference should be considered on index time instead Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: alexander.blanchard(a)ptfs-europe.com, dcook(a)prosentient.com.au, jacob.omara(a)ptfs-europe.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com Currently, results are being skipped after the search has been processed in C4/Search.pm. This may cause several unintended scenarios: 1) The first page has all the results skipped, even thought there are more results in 2nd page and so on, this will will result in a "No search results" page 2) The total search results number still shows 80 (for example), even if it has skipped 70 and is only showing 10. To reproduce we need to use both OpacHiddenItems and OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord Use OpacHiddenItems and put some rules that hide some items Use OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord = 'hide' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 23