February 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19501] New: New list category to restrict specific lists to staff & hide from OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Sep '26

13 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19501 Bug ID: 19501 Summary: New list category to restrict specific lists to staff & hide from OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: Jeremy.evans(a)nibsc.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl We are creating various lists of titles that need to be hidden from view in the OPAC for the time being but other staff members need to see them. At the moment the options are Public or Private so this won't do what we require. We would like an additional list category selection of Staff so that those lists are then visible in the staff client (& presumably also to anyone who logs into the OPAC with a staff permissions login) but are not publicly visible in the OPAC. The intention is that multiple staff members may need to add items to some of these lists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 53

[Bug 34632] New: Patron Importing should be a background job
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Sep '26

12 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34632 Bug ID: 34632 Summary: Patron Importing should be a background job Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: wizzyrea(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi friends, Now that we have a lovely queue for our background jobs, we should make the patron import use the queue to process those and store the outcome. This will help us avoid the 500/600/whatever you set apache timeouts experienced by libraries whenever they import batches of patrons of any significant size. Cheers, Liz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 53

[Bug 21052] New: New patron card printer profile won't save if paper bin is empty
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Sep '26

12 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21052 Bug ID: 21052 Summary: New patron card printer profile won't save if paper bin is empty Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When adding a new printer profile in the patron card creator tool, you can save without entering a paper bin, but it will not create a new entry in the database. There is no error, the field is not marked as required. To test: - Add a new printer profile - Fill in description, leave other fields unchanged - Save - Verify that the new printer profile doesn't appear in the list and hasn't been created -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 34

[Bug 20344] New: Transferring an item while on hold results in a transfer were the destination is the same as the source
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20344 Bug ID: 20344 Summary: Transferring an item while on hold results in a transfer were the destination is the same as the source Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: victor.grousset(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com 1. Check out an item 2. Place a hold on the specific item with a pickup at a different branch 3. Check in: Confirm hold and transfert 4. Check the branchtransfers table to ensure that the transfert is here SELECT * FROM branchtransfers order by datesent DESC LIMIT 10; 5. Home › Circulation › Transfers 6. Create a transfer identical as the existing one 7. You should see «Item is already at destination library.» 8. Check the branchtransfers table 1. First one should have been canceled «Canceled, new transfer from A to A created» 2. Another one should have been created from A to A 3. These 2 things are the issue. Because doing the same without a hold - doesn't create a new transfer - doesn't cancel the first one -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 31391] New: Staff-side recalls
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31391 Bug ID: 31391 Summary: Staff-side recalls Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Add functionality for recalls to be placed via the staff interface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 330

[Bug 35052] New: OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord system preference should be considered on index time instead
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35052 Bug ID: 35052 Summary: OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord system preference should be considered on index time instead Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: alexander.blanchard(a)ptfs-europe.com, dcook(a)prosentient.com.au, jacob.omara(a)ptfs-europe.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com Currently, results are being skipped after the search has been processed in C4/Search.pm. This may cause several unintended scenarios: 1) The first page has all the results skipped, even thought there are more results in 2nd page and so on, this will will result in a "No search results" page 2) The total search results number still shows 80 (for example), even if it has skipped 70 and is only showing 10. To reproduce we need to use both OpacHiddenItems and OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord Use OpacHiddenItems and put some rules that hide some items Use OpacHiddenItemsHidesRecord = 'hide' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 35

[Bug 36135] New: Add tool to batch edit pick up dates of holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36135 Bug ID: 36135 Summary: Add tool to batch edit pick up dates of holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: emmi.takkinen(a)koha-suomi.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com There are sometimes situations where libraries have to extend their holds pick up dates. We should at same kind of tool for this like "Batch extend due dates". However criteria for dates to extend can be complicated (we've excluded e.g. items with specific state, holds with found status, items on transfer to specific library). So rather than using predefined criteria for holds to edit (at least for the start), tool should have option to upload file of SQL query results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 269

[Bug 35246] New: REST API: api/v1/biblios crashes with accept header application/json
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35246 Bug ID: 35246 Summary: REST API: api/v1/biblios crashes with accept header application/json Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl CC: tomascohen(a)gmail.com See also bug 33960. Found it testing there. [2023/11/03 10:33:00] [ERROR] GET /api/v1/biblios: unhandled exception (Mojo::Exception)<<Can't call method "to_api" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/Koha/Biblio.pm line 1433.>> => my $json_biblioitem = $self->biblioitem->to_api( $args ); Just testing /api/v1/biblios with Accept=application/json. Note that Accept=application/marc works fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 31925] New: AutoCreateAuthorities needs to preserve subject heading thesaurus to not create duplicate authority records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31925 Bug ID: 31925 Summary: AutoCreateAuthorities needs to preserve subject heading thesaurus to not create duplicate authority records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: phil(a)chetcolibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Depends on: 30280 Bug 30280 taught the linker that "650 _ 0 $aFeminism" and "650 _ 7 $aFeminism$2sao" are not the same heading, so a bib record containing the latter should not be linked to the authority record which matches the former. However, AutoCreateAuthorities just creates LCSH authority records from anything, no matter what the values of indicator 2 and subfield 2 are. As a result, if you have an LCSH authority record for a term, and you import/create a non-LCSH term in a bib record and save it, AutoCreateAuthorities will create a new duplicate LCSH authority record and link to that. Every single time, a new duplicate. Steps to reproduce: 1. Use ElasticSearch, since the patch for bug 30280 only expected to work there, and in fact broke linking on Zebra, bug 31924. 2. Enable the preferences AutoCreateAuthorities, AutoLinkBiblios, CatalogModuleRelink 3. Edit any bib record, add a 650 tag, set the second indicator to 7, type Feminism in subfield a and type sao in subfield 2. 4. Save the record, edit it again, note the authority record id in subfield 9 of the Feminism heading. 5. Edit any other bib record, add a 650 tag, set the second indicator to 7, type Feminism in subfield a and type sao in subfield 2. 6. Save the record, edit it again, note the authority record id in subfield 9 of the Feminism heading. The two authority record ids should be the same, since the headings are identical, but instead one will be linked to, say, 1708 and the next to 1709, an identical duplicate record. Rather than setting position 11 of field 008 in the authority record to "a" for LCSH, AutoCreateAuthorities should have set it to "z" for Other and put sao in subfield f of field 040 (and for non-7, non-0 values of indicator 2, it should be setting 008/11 to the correct letter for that indicator value). Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30280 [Bug 30280] Support authority records with common subject headings from different thesaurus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 84

[Bug 32940] New: [Bug 30280 follow-up] Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions search field missing in Zebra
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32940 Bug ID: 32940 Summary: [Bug 30280 follow-up] Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions search field missing in Zebra Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: januszop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: frank.hansen(a)ub.lu.se, katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de In the bug 30280 a new searchfield Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions has been introduced for ElasticSearch (indexing 040 $f of an authority record). This searchfield is used in C4::Heading::_search with an alias thesaurus-conventions (introduced with the same bug and defined only in Koha/SearchEngine/Elasticsearch/QueryBuilder.pm). At the same time, neither Subject-heading-thesaurus-conventions nor thesaurus-conventions are defined for Zebra. As a result, while performing a linking (with link_bibs_to_authorities.pl for instance) of a biblio 6XX field with 2nd indicator == 7 and proper $2 (e.g. 650 _7 $a Ekonomia $2 DBN) with Zebra engine we get: error: Unsupported Use attribute (114) thesaurus-conventions Bib-1 On the other hand, according to the stable Zebra configuration (for 15 years or so) Koha inserts 040 $f into the Subject-heading-thesaurus index, as goes there 008/11 byte, transformed in the following way: a => lcsh b => lcac c => mesh d => nal k => cash n => notapplicable r => aat s => sears v => rvm So, maybe ES should go the same way? If for some reasons no, the Koha part should be modified accordingly. It seems that changes made in Koha in favour of the ES should always be very carefully checked in Zebra context... Now the linking feature in Zebra does not work in most cases (also described in the bug 32916). Seeing the comment at https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30280#c58, I understand that the enhancement is still not mature enough. So, I am wondering that it has been accepted in the released version (22.11.00)... Was this not by mistake? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1