January 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19814] New: Batch Check-in function
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Aug '26

25 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19814 Bug ID: 19814 Summary: Batch Check-in function Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: smichaelxx(a)tlen.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi, in Koha exists function named "Batch Check out" but there is no "Batch Check in". A lot of small libraries don't have self-check station. Maybe a good solution would be adding function "Batch Check in"? Thanks a lot Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 188

[Bug 20747] New: Allow LocalHoldsPriority to fill by hierarchical groups system rather than individual library
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Aug '26

25 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20747 Bug ID: 20747 Summary: Allow LocalHoldsPriority to fill by hierarchical groups system rather than individual library Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com It would be great if the LocalHoldsPriority could be used within a district in a consortium. >>Christopher expressed concern, adding on “grouping” – some libraries may not >>want to be effected. Typically this is all or nothing or on or off. Example, >>the circulation of Mobile Hotspots; hotspots are popular outside of CDA but CDA >>patrons get priority, Rathdrum is pushed down. Consider an “Item type” or “Item >>level” opt out which would be similar to how suppression works. If the >>modification increased features and flexibility, there may be more interest from >>the larger group in supporting the enhancement. Group structure for settings, a >>hierarchy based system, and refinement is needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 87

[Bug 16631] New: Show groups/categories of reports to authorized staff
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Aug '26

25 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16631 Bug ID: 16631 Summary: Show groups/categories of reports to authorized staff Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be helpful to have reports that are specific groups/categories to be authorized under the reports permissions in a patron account. Not everyone wants to see everyone else's reports, some are similar but are not. Some are for superlibrarians to test, and are not ready for use. It would be great if we could specify groups and even subgroups in the permissions that the staff could access, or specify all groups. All groups should be the norm for a superlibrarian. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 283

[Bug 21272] New: Marc import should warn about mis-matched branch and item-type fields in 952 during marc import.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21272 Bug ID: 21272 Summary: Marc import should warn about mis-matched branch and item-type fields in 952 during marc import. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When importing a record that has homebranch (952$a), holding branch (952$b) or item type (952$y) populated, but not matching values in branches.branchcode or itemtypes.itemtype, koha will indicate that items were not imported (via the count of imported items), but not why. This causes frequent confusion among new users. It would be nice to offer mappings between detected branches / item types and the branches and item types already in the system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 101

[Bug 20307] New: Language overlay for authorized values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '26

24 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20307 Bug ID: 20307 Summary: Language overlay for authorized values Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 14100 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14100 [Bug 14100] Add base to make item types, branch names, sysprefs values and authorised values translatable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 147

[Bug 19442] New: add patron attributes into the patron card creator
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '26

22 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19442 Bug ID: 19442 Summary: add patron attributes into the patron card creator Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Work to be done: 1 - Add the ability to define fields as attribute.CODE in the card creator template 2 - When these codes are found replace them with the correct value for the patron -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 19316] New: Items should have sort1 and sort2 fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19316 Bug ID: 19316 Summary: Items should have sort1 and sort2 fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Librarians love data, like for real, they can't get enough. We often find that libraries want extra information in their items table, things that don't fit or don't belong in any of the existing columns. Borrowers have sort1 and sort2 for this kind of information - we should add analogous fields to the items table -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 55

[Bug 20846] New: Suppressed Records Still Appear in Public Lists
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '26

21 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20846 Bug ID: 20846 Summary: Suppressed Records Still Appear in Public Lists Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org To test: 1. Add a title to a public list 2. Edit the 942$n to suppress the record 3. Confirm that the record isn't visible in the opac 4. Confirm that the title still shows in the list It'd be great to have suppressed records hidden from lists. Even if the link from the list to the bib takes the user to the blocked record page, showing the title in the list is confusing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 27

[Bug 21860] New: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Aug '26

20 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21860 Bug ID: 21860 Summary: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)joensuu.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The marc modification templates have no way of checking or changing indicator values. This seems like a pretty big oversight. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 102

[Bug 16207] New: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Aug '26

20 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16207 Bug ID: 16207 Summary: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I think we could simplify circulation and fine rules by incorporating library groups into the mix. For example, I have 27 libraries, and 8 of them follow the same set of rules that are different from the defaults. So, what if instead of cloning these special rules to 8 different libraries (and who knows how many other duplicated sets of rules there are), we defined a set of rules for a library group. If the library is part of that group, it goes by those rules. I don't know if we want to use the same library groups that are already defined in the libraries and groups, or if we want to create a unique Circ rule group. Because, there is always the chance that one or more of the libraries in the 8 that are grouped together by affiliation or region could have a slightly different set of rules. However, I think rules by groups would make managing rules far less complicated than managing groups of cloned rules. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13