November 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 23269] New: Long hold queues are slowing the service
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23269 Bug ID: 23269 Summary: Long hold queues are slowing the service Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: emmi.takkinen(a)outlook.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In Finlands public libraries hold queues can be huge due popular records having a lot of holds at the same time. Most popular records may even have over 1000 holds. This leads the service slowing significantly when browsing their holds page. There should be pagination in the holds table for efficient page loading. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 118

[Bug 19814] New: Batch Check-in function
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19814 Bug ID: 19814 Summary: Batch Check-in function Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: smichaelxx(a)tlen.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi, in Koha exists function named "Batch Check out" but there is no "Batch Check in". A lot of small libraries don't have self-check station. Maybe a good solution would be adding function "Batch Check in"? Thanks a lot Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 102

[Bug 32327] New: When replacing bib record via z39.50, only 1 ISBN should be searched and it should be normalized
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32327 Bug ID: 32327 Summary: When replacing bib record via z39.50, only 1 ISBN should be searched and it should be normalized Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrewfh(a)dubcolib.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl The replace via z39.50 function pre-populates the z39.50 search form with values from the existing bib. Koha just pastes in the contents of biblioitems.isbn, which means it very often pre-populates that field with a value that will never find anything. If the existing record has more than 1 ISBN, the prepopulated form will list them all, pipe-separated. This search will always return no results, even when either ISBN returns results successfully on its own. If the existing record contains a parenthetical note about binding, that search will generally fail as well. We should only put the first ISBN from the record into the search form and we should strip out any binding note or other fluff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 28740] New: Delete old ILL requests with cleanup_database
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28740 Bug ID: 28740 Summary: Delete old ILL requests with cleanup_database Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz, tomascohen(a)gmail.com We should teach cleanup_database to delete old ILL requests after a given period. Over in bug 23391, we introduced a syspref in which one can define statuses for which to hide ILL requests. Following that same idea of allowing whatever statuses a given back-end may use, the cron should take a number of days and a status and delete any request with that status that is more than that many days old. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 28915] New: MARC Modification Templates should allow specification of a position or range within a control field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28915 Bug ID: 28915 Summary: MARC Modification Templates should allow specification of a position or range within a control field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When dealing with the MARC Leader, 008, and other fixed length control fields, it would be nice to be able to make the modification templates look at, match on, and alter only a specific position or range. For example, suppose I have several records in which I want to change the 008 position 33 (Literary form) from a 0 to a 1 (nonfiction to fiction). Currently I could tell my modification template to update the 008 of every record I point it at where the character in position 33 is a 0 (using regex to match only that specific character). But then there's no way to change ONLY that character and preserve the rest of the field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 144

[Bug 21860] New: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21860 Bug ID: 21860 Summary: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)joensuu.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The marc modification templates have no way of checking or changing indicator values. This seems like a pretty big oversight. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 69

[Bug 31391] New: Staff-side recalls
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31391 Bug ID: 31391 Summary: Staff-side recalls Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Add functionality for recalls to be placed via the staff interface -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 276

[Bug 23988] New: When replace record with z39.50, give option on what gets pre-populated
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Jul '26

12 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23988 Bug ID: 23988 Summary: When replace record with z39.50, give option on what gets pre-populated Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Currently in Koha, when a user chooses to replace an existing record with another record using z39.50, Koha will prepopulate the z39.50 search with Title, Author and ISBN. This search is very constrictive and it would be nice to have the option of what fields get prepopulated instead of having to manually remove the fields that the user doesn't want. Specifically, an ISBN pre-population would be ideal for a library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 29653] New: Return claims on deleted items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Jul '26

12 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29653 Bug ID: 29653 Summary: Return claims on deleted items Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mspagnuolo(a)nrhtx.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com When an item that has been claims returned previously is deleted, the item no longer shows on the patron's account. I would prefer Koha to leave the name of the item or a place holder to be able to track claims returns better. Or perhaps a counter that is not dependent on the item being in the system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 22439] New: Duplicated code in PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Jul '26

12 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22439 Bug ID: 22439 Summary: Duplicated code in PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)koha-suomi.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Target Milestone: --- The C4/Biblio.pm subroutines PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field both do the same thing, so should be merged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 47